<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fwsm on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</title>
    <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/fwsm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Fwsm on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/fwsm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Using SPF Records To Build Objects</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2009/10/using-spf-records-to-build-objects/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2009/10/using-spf-records-to-build-objects/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My biggest complain about modern firewalls is their lack of the ability to create rules based on URLs or HTTP streams; you have to open access between IP addresses.  Yes, I know there are other means to do that, but I want my ASA/PIX/FWSM to do it without making me do so much work.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Anyway, the fact that you have to use IPs brings up some interesting problems.  Let&amp;rsquo;s say you have a server in a DMZ that needs to query Google for some content.  Since you&amp;rsquo;re a hard-ass network guy like I am, you tell the admin that they have provide the data flow they want to use &amp;ndash; source IP, destination IP, protocol, port.  They come back and tell you that they need their server to connect via HTTP to 74.125.45.100.  You put in the rules as given, but the IP has suddenly changed on you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Object Groups in the ASA/FWSM/PIX</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2009/10/object-groups-in-the-asafwsmpix/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2009/10/object-groups-in-the-asafwsmpix/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;rsquo;t believe I haven&amp;rsquo;t talked about &lt;em&gt;object-groups&lt;/em&gt; yet.  I had a whole other blog entry written up, and, when I went to link things over, I realized I couldn&amp;rsquo;t find an intro to it.  Here it goes.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the modern world.  A world of wonder.  A world of quickly-advancing technology.  A world where clusters of machines sit behind load balancers for scalability and availability.  A world where those clusters need access to other clusters.  A world where your firewall rulebase gets so big that it&amp;rsquo;s unreadable without some help.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASA and Proxy ARP</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2009/09/asa-and-proxy-arp/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2009/09/asa-and-proxy-arp/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wow.  A new entry.  Everyone sit down before you pass out.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve got a real-world example for you today.  We have an ASA 5540 installed at a business unit with interfaces in multiple networks, including one containing the production servers and another containing the accounting servers.  The production network sits on a 7600 that&amp;rsquo;s not ours, so, to avoid IP conflicts, we are statically NATting connections into that network.  The 7600 has with many, many VLANs, and, since the firewall production servers are on different VLANs, there&amp;rsquo;s an interface VLAN between us.  Sounds pretty straightforward, but it just wasn&amp;rsquo;t working when we try to connect between the interfaces.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Port Forwarding on the ASA/FWSM/PIX</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2008/05/port-forwarding-on-the-asafwsmpix/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2008/05/port-forwarding-on-the-asafwsmpix/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s a simple one since I haven&amp;rsquo;t updated in a while. I have my ASA 5505 at home and want to forward TCP/80 traffic to my public IP to my webserver at 10.10.10.10. There are two steps here &amp;ndash; forward the port and open the ACL.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;To forward the port, I would use the &lt;em&gt;static&lt;/em&gt; directive, but there are two ways to do that. I can either set up a one-to-one NAT or a port redirection. In the one-to-one NAT, you have a outside address that&amp;rsquo;s mapped directly to an inside address, and any traffic to that IP is passed to the inside host (if it passes ACLS, of course). One of the limitation, though, of using this setup is that you can&amp;rsquo;t use that IP as your PAT address, and, since I only have one IP, no other inside hosts would have a outside address to which to be NATted. The other method &amp;ndash; port redirection &amp;ndash; is a much better solution. In this setup, I actually forward a protocol/port on a outside address to a protocol/port on an inside address. Since there are other ports available on that outside address, the address is still available for other hosts to use as a NAT address.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Getting Started with the FWSM</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2008/05/getting-started-with-the-fwsm/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2008/05/getting-started-with-the-fwsm/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Have I talked about the Cisco Firewall Services Module (FWSM) before? It&amp;rsquo;s a firewall on a module for the 6500 and is based on the PIX firewall. The term &amp;ldquo;based on&amp;rdquo; is important here, since it does a lot of stuff the PIX does but everything. It obviously does connection inspection and filtering, but it does not do any VPN stuff. It&amp;rsquo;s not a license thing; it just won&amp;rsquo;t do it. If you want to do VPNs on the 6500, you have to get the IPSec VPN Service Module.  The VPN thing isn&amp;rsquo;t true, actually.  I believe version 3.1 and higher has support for VPNs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
