<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ipv4 on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</title>
    <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/ipv4/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ipv4 on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/ipv4/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>ROUTE Notes - Implementing IPv6 in an IPv4 Network</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/07/route-notes-implementing-ipv6-in-an-ipv4-network/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/07/route-notes-implementing-ipv6-in-an-ipv4-network/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study Questions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Your boss says that ever host in the network needs to be converted over to IPv6 by the end of the day.  Which of multipoint tunnels, point-to-point tunnels, or native IPv6 would be the most appropriate to use to help with that conversion?&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Native IPv6&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;The engineering department wants to permanently use IPv6 on their test boxes in two offices.  Which of multipoint tunnels, point-to-point tunnels, or native IPv6 would be the most appropriate to use?&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Point-to-point tunnels&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
