<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Spanning-Tree on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</title>
    <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/spanning-tree/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Spanning-Tree on Aaron&#39;s Worthless Words</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/tags/spanning-tree/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Stubby Post - UplinkFast</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/04/stubby-post-uplinkfast/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/04/stubby-post-uplinkfast/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve got a few switches daisy chained together with single links and have enabled UplinkFast on them.  This switch is not the root bridge; F0/24 is the root port and F0/23 is a blocked alternate port. I&amp;rsquo;ve got &lt;em&gt;debug spanning-tree uplinkfast&lt;/em&gt; on to help out.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;div class=&#34;highlight&#34;&gt;&lt;pre tabindex=&#34;0&#34; class=&#34;chroma&#34;&gt;&lt;code data-lang=&#34;fallback&#34;&gt;&lt;span class=&#34;line&#34;&gt;&lt;span class=&#34;cl&#34;&gt;SW3#sh span | incl 0/2[34]&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&#34;line&#34;&gt;&lt;span class=&#34;cl&#34;&gt;Fa0/23           Altn BLK 3019      128.23   P2p&#xA;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class=&#34;line&#34;&gt;&lt;span class=&#34;cl&#34;&gt;Fa0/24           Root FWD 3019      128.24   P2p&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Now let&amp;rsquo;s unplug F0/24 and see what happens.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stubby Post - Path Cost of EtherChannels</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/04/stubby-post-path-cost-of-etherchannels/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/04/stubby-post-path-cost-of-etherchannels/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I was doing some STP labs tonight and found something that caught me off guard a bit.  I had been meddling with some EtherChannels between a pair of 3750s earlier today, and I forgot to reset the configs before starting on the STP stuff.  One my secondary root switch, I ran a &lt;em&gt;show spanning-tree vlan 1&lt;/em&gt; to see what status the ports were in, and I noticed the root path cost.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SWITCH – STP Exercise #1 Solution</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/04/switch-stp-exercise-1-solution/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2010/04/switch-stp-exercise-1-solution/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Did you guys have any trouble with the solution to the STP exercise?  Let&amp;rsquo;s work through it and see what happens.  I got a few responses to the solution, and everyone seems to get the same answer, so I assume we&amp;rsquo;re all right.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Before we get started, I wanted to mention the tie breakers since there can be ties in STP.  If there is a tie in any calculation, the same tie breakers are used, so I&amp;rsquo;ll list them here to use as we move through the calculations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BCMSN Notes -- STP States</title>
      <link>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2009/05/bcmsn-notes-stp-states/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://a996c8ee.aww-3cz.pages.dev/posts/2009/05/bcmsn-notes-stp-states/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve decided to take on the CCNP certification, so I&amp;rsquo;m going to wind up with a few posts will be more my own notes than anything.  :)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A switch port on a 2960 comes up with a default configuration on VLAN 1.  What happens from the perspective of spanning-tree?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;First, the port comes up on &lt;strong&gt;blocking&lt;/strong&gt; mode.  This is to make sure that loops aren&amp;rsquo;t created without first listening to the network to see what&amp;rsquo;s going on.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Next, if the port may be a root or designated port, the port is moved to the &lt;strong&gt;listening&lt;/strong&gt; state.  In this state, the port can send and receives BPDUs only.  It can&amp;rsquo;t send traffic, but it can discover the other switches participating in STP.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;After the forwarding delay, the port goes into the &lt;strong&gt;learning&lt;/strong&gt; state.   In this state, the port can send and receive BPDUs as in listening, but it can now receive traffic.  It can&amp;rsquo;t yet send any.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;After the forwarding delay again, the port goes into the &lt;strong&gt;forwarding&lt;/strong&gt; state.  The port can now send and receive data.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If the port is configured with &lt;em&gt;spanning-tree portfast&lt;/em&gt;, the mode goes from &lt;strong&gt;blocking&lt;/strong&gt; directly to &lt;strong&gt;forwarding&lt;/strong&gt; without going through these steps.  Obviously you don&amp;rsquo;t want a switch plugged into a port configured for portfast since you may wind up with a loop.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
